BSoUP


British Splash-in Championships 2008

The deadline for submission of prints in this year's competition is Wednesday 21 May. Full details


Our Sponsors

Awards for All - Sponsors of BSoUP digital projector 2007

National Aquarium  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006, 2007 & 2008

Tony Backhurst Scuba  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006, 2007 & 2008

Olympus - Sponsors of the Splash-in 2007 & 2008

Oonasdivers   - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2008

Mike's Dive Stores - Sponsors of the Splash-in 2008

Alan James Photography. Sponsors of the Splash-in 2006

Cameras Underwater  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006, 2007 & 2008

Dive Magazine  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006 & the Annual Open Portfolio Competition

Diver Magazine - Sponsors of the Annual Beginners Portfolio Competition

AP Valves  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006 & 2007Buddy  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006 & 2007

Martin Edge  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006 & 2007

Ocean Visions - Sponsors of the Splash-in 2007

Ocean Optics  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006, 2007 & 2008

Sea & Sea  - Sponsors of BSoUP Splash-in 2006

Sport Diver - sponsors of the annual Best of British Portfolio Competition & the Spalsh-in 2008

Ultimate Sports. Spomsors of the Splash-in 2006 & 2007

Constable - sponsors of the Splash-in 2008

Dorling Kindersley - Sponsors of the Splash-in 2008

 

Underwater cameras

by Peter Rowlands

Reproduced from in focus 21 (April 1987)

Compared to land photography, there is a much smaller choice of cameras for underwater use. They fall into three broad categories - amphibious cameras for use down to 10 metres, amphibious cameras for deeper use down to 50 metres and housed land cameras.

AMPHIBIOUS CAMERAS FOR USE DOWN TO 10 METRES

Recent years have seen a frenzy of activity in this area. Five vears ago there was really only the Weathermatic, a 110 format camera, but now there are 35 mm shallow water cameras available from Canon (AS6), Nikon (L35AV), and Fuji (RDK). Now Vivitar and most recently Ricoh have also produced such campras, In simple tprms, all of these cameras are intended for use in the 'splash zone' and occasionally underwater. From serious underwater photographers point of view they are not versatile enough in that their depth rating is limited and the accessories .available are either very limited or non existant.

Most have built-in flash units which would really should only be used on land as they are to close to the lens that they would cause extreme backscatter even in clear waters. As they are aimed at the 'Point and shoot,' user, these cameras tend to be fully automatic with a limited range of shutter speeds.

They are however, great fun to use as they allow shots to be taken in what was traditionally a forbidden area. Surfing, waterfalls, skiing and even in the shower/bath are just some of the new locations where these cameras thrive.

AMPHIBIOUS CAMERAS FOR USE DOWN TO 50 METRES

Althouh the choice is extremely limited, this type of camera is the most widely used underwater. For serious underwater photography the most popular is the. Nikonos which is fully waterproof down to 50 metres.

For those who flinch at the latest prices, there is the Sea & Sea Motormarine 35 which has a range of accessories including close-up and wide-angle lenses and external flas.hguns. This is the motor-wind and rewind camera with a 35 min fixed lens. A built-in light meter indicates correct exposure settings.

Because it has been produced in various models since the late 1950's. the most popular amphibious camera is the Nikonos which has interchangeable lenses, a wide range of accessories and, with the latest version, sophisticated exposure control for both available and electronic flash. Their availability throughout the world has established them as a standard and independent manufacturers have added to Nikon's accessories to make the Nikonos system by far and away the most comprehensive.

Nothing is perfect, and amphibious cameras do have some drawbacks. The main one being that they do not allow 'reflex' viewing through the lens. This means all focusing has to be done by estimating the camera to subject distance and setting the lens accordingly. Such a limitation is not too terminal as most underwater photographs tend to be taken with close-up lenses which incorporate a framing/focus device or with wideangles which have a greater depth of field, so reducing the need for ultra-accurate distance estimation.

The big advantage of amphibicus cameras is that they are small and easy to use. You load them just like a land camera and there are no external controls to line-up when assembling the camera, Their accessorv lenses are corrected for underwater use and so tend to give higher quality.

That there are so mariv Nikonos in use today is indication enough of heir
suitability for serious underwater photography. Like all equipment they are not perfect but I'm sure that if we had an SLR Nikonos, we'd find some fault with it!

CAMERA HOUSINGS

The alternative to an amphibious camera is to put your existing land camera into an underwater housing. These housings fall into two sections. Flexible for use down to 10 metres and rigid housings for use down to 100 metres.

The flexible housings have similar attributes to shallow water cameras in that they are not intended for serious use but rather are ideal for using existing, equipment in conditions which would ruin normal cameras. They can accomodate a wide range of cameras and there are different sizes to allow flashguns, motor drives and zoom
to be used. Being flexible, they are far from easy to use but do allow land cameras to go underwater at a comparatively small cost.

For more dedicated use, there are rigid housings available for most 35 mm SLR and some large format cameras. The big advantage of using a land camera in a housing is being able to see what is in focus and to be able to compose accurately. In addition, you have a much wider choice of lenses and other accessories available. Being able to see whether your subject is in focus allows you to use macro lenses which are very versatile, These are ideal lenses for nearly all forms of srnall marine life.

Being able to compose each shot is also a major benefit, but make sure that your camera housing provides this benefit as most SLR cameras have small eyepieces which are fine on land but with the housing wall and the displacement of your mask to contend with your eye ends up quite a way from the viewfinder. The result is that you can only see the centre of the frame. Accessory viewfinders are available (from Ikelite) to improve this situation and they offer an effective solution.

The top of the range alternative is to use an SLR which has a prism. This can be replaced with a larger prism which gives full frame viewing, from further back. Unfortunately the cameras with this facility (Nikon F/F2/F4, Canon F1/F1N and Pentax LX, are also at the top of the price range, although secondhand prices can be those of new cameras without a removable prism.

Compared to amphibious cameras, housings tend to be rruch bigger and more complicated to use. Practice does improve the situation, and most people get used to their and their housings and their little idiosynchrosies. Cost wise, there are rigid housing available for just over £200 but as soon as you want them as small a possible with interchangeable ports the price goes up rapidly and may end up with
three noughts on the end.

The decison whether to house a land camera or use an amphibious one is not an easy one. There are advantages and disadvantages from both and this dilemma will only disappedr when there is an SLR camera. The writer cannot envIsage any manufacture/specialist producing this specialist item but would love to be proved wrong ..