|
Cameras
- Amphibious or not?
by Peter Rowlands
Reproduced
from in focus 15
(April 1986)
There
is
no commercially available amphibious camera which has reflex viewing
and a wide choice of lenses. And, doubtless, If there was it would
be prohibitively expensive. For this reason underwater photographers
have to make a choice between an amphibious camera and housing a
land camera.
HOUSINGS
- THE ADVANTAGES
The
biggest single advantage of using a land camera in an underwater
housing is that you can have reflex (through the lens) viewing.
This allows you to see exactly what you are photographing and to
cheek whether your subject is in focus and that the shot is correctly
composed.
The
best camera for housing is one whose standard prism can be removed
and replaced with a larger prism designed to allow the whole image
to be viewed from further back. Prisms that can do this are called
Actionfinders or Sportsfinders and are available on the top of the
range cameras from Nikon, Canon and Pentax.
Looking through the standard viewfinder of a housed camera underwater
restricts the image area, so that it becomes necessary to move your
eye to scan the whole image area. This is not convenient, but like
all things, becomes easier with practice.
There
is a wide range of land cameras available, so you have quite a choice,
and the range of lenses is almost limitless, from circular fisheyes
to long telephotos, The only limitation being whether the housing
can accommodate the lenses of your choice. However, because you
are using a land lens underwater, some distortion to the Image may
occur and the angle of coverage behind a flat part will be reduced.
Fortunately this is easily overcome, as most housings have correction
ports available to restore both the optical quality of the lens
and its angle of coverage. Perhaps the most useful lenses are the
"macro" lenses, which can focus from infinity down to
a few inches. These are very versatile, especially for marine biology/natural
history shots.
Like
most people, you probably already own a land camera. You should,
however, consider very carefully whether it is suitable for use
in a housing underwater. Unless it has reflex viewing, interchangeable
lenses, and control over aperture and focusing then It probably
isn't. Finally, there must be a housing available or you must be
prepared to build one, either from a kit or from scratch.
An
additional feature of using a land camera in a housing is that you
can choose which film format you want to use. Housings are available
for all formats from 110 to 6x7cm
HOUSINGS
- THE DISADVANTAGES
Land
cameras in housings are, by comparison with amphibious cameras,
bulkier and heavier. To what extent depends on the individual manufacturer,
There are modern housings available which are as small as they possibly
can be, since they are designed with one particular camera in mind.
These tend to be more expensive than the larger housings, which
can be adapted to fit a wide range of cameras.
For
those of you who travel overseas, the bulk and weight can cause
problems with transportation and the odd shape housings demand a
very large case. It is often better to dismantle the housing for
the journey and reassemble it on arrival at your destination,
The
cost of housings is high. This is because manufacturers cannot make
and sell them in such large numbers. A commercially available polycarbonate
SLR camera housing is almost the same price as a Nikonos V with
a 35 mm lens. Move to an aluminium housing and you soon overtake
on price.
Installing
your land camera in a housing involves attaching linkages onto the
aperture, shutter speed, focus, shutter release and wind-on controls.
These are fine once set, but can be fiddly and prone to misalignment
when you are underwater. It is often simpler to commit a camera
to use in a housing, so that the setting up procedure need not be
repeated each time you want to take photographs underwater.
AMPHIBIOUS
CAMERAS - THE ADVANTAGES
All
amphibious cameras tend to be smaller and lighter than housed land
cameras. Their outer shell is the housing and the controls are purpose
designed and permanently attached, so there is no setting up procedure
each time you want to use the camera. Despite being non-reflex,
amphibious cameras are quite versatile in most areas. The Nikonos
range are excellent for close-ups and macro shots, where a frame
is used to delimit the subject area and focal distance and when
used with wide-angle lenses are a small and easily operated package.
These two areas represent the majority of underwater shots.
Despite
the limited choice of amphibious cameras, there is a wide range
of accessories available which make them very versatile. This is
more true for the Nikonos than other cameras, With the appropriate
accessory the Nikonos is capable of taking almost any underwater
photograph required.
Finally,
if you wish to, it is much easier to sell an amphibious camera than
a land camera in a housing,
AMPHIBIOUS
CAMERAS - THE DISADVANTAGES
Being
non-reflex is the amphibious cameras downfall. Not only is it more
(not to mention difficult to compose your shots but it is not possible
to continually focus on your subject. However, with the available
accessories, and bearing in mind the limited range within which
most underwater photographs are taken i.e. close-ups or wide-angle,
then amphibious cameras do fit the bill in a surprisingly simple
and effective package, There are far fewer amphibious cameras to
choose from and, bearing versatility and serious use in mind, there
is really only the Nikonos. This is a specialist camera which not
all camera repairers can repair, should something go wrong. In out
of the way places you may have difficulty having the camera repaired.
CONCLUSIONS
There
is no SLR amphibious camera at a reasonable price with good interchangeable
lenses, so we have to make the most of the equipment available and
settle an a compromise.
No
conclusion in favour of one particular system can be reached, as
the needs and tastes of the individual vary and indeed
Reproduced
from in focus 15
(April 1986) |